Clarence got into Yale in 1971 under an explicit affirmative action program that was implemented the very year he applied. Though he admitted as much while he worked at the EEOC in the 1980s, he later became a huge opponent of affirmative action while he pretended he "pulled himself up by his bootstraps". Really all he did was pull up the ladder with him.

By now, it is well-known that Clarence's wife, Ginni, is a radical idiot who embraced The Big Lie and was part of the coordinated attempt to overthrow our democracy. In texts and emails she sent Trump administration staff, she urged them to ignore the results of the 2020 election, told them that those who opposed the coup should be "living in barges off GITMO," and advocated QAnon conspiracies with absolutely no supporting evidence. She belongs to groups that still think Trump is secretly the real president of the United States. None of this is a surprise, since Ginni Thomas herself admits that she was part of a cult in the 1980s (in a 1991 interview, she said "I was once in a group that used mind control techniques" -- seems like something she's susceptible to). 

Despite this, Clarence Thomas has refused to recuse himself from cases regarding the January 6 insurrection. That is because he and his wife have an agenda that, for him, transcends his duty to the Court he sits on and the Country he is supposed to serve. So, indeed, it was no surprise that when his wife called the January 6 commission an "overly partisan political persecution," Clarence Thomas coincidentally was the only justice of the Supreme Court to say he would have granted Trump's request to shield the documents when the case came before the Court. The man and his wife are traitors who are actively working in tandem to undermining our democracy, and must be treated accordingly.

Take the recent Dobbs opinion, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The opinion sent shockwaves through the United States and overturned 50 years of settled law that gave women a say in what happens to their own bodies. But for Clarence Thomas, that wasn't enough.

No no, for Clarence, this wasn't the main course, but just an appetizer. He wrote a concurrence, laden with the palpable sounds of him licking his chops at what could come next. While the majority opinion shamelessly wrote about the "unfounded fear" that their decision would "imperil those other rights [Griswold (contraception), Eisenstadt (same), Lawrence (sexual conduct with member of the same sex), and Obergefell (same-sex marriage)]" -- Clarence Thomas wasted no time explaining why that fear is far from unfounded. In his concurring opinion, Thomas said the Court should "reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents," specifically mentioning Griswold v. Connecticut (allowing married couples to use contraceptives), Lawrence v. Texas (making it unconstitutional to make gay sex illegal) and Obergefell v. Hodges (legalizing gay marriage).

Anita Hill was an employee under the supervision of Clarence Thomas. During his confirmation hearing she testified that he was constantly sexually harassing her by asking her out, talking about his dick, and talking about what kind of porn he liked (which included people fucking animals, rape scenes, etc). Anita Hill was maligned, but she had multiple witnesses that worked alongside her and Thomas, and she even took a polygraph which concluded she was telling the truth. Subsequent investigations by journalists have further confirmed her allegations.

Thomas had no such witnesses, and refused to take the polygraph. Instead, consistent with his lifelong, trademark hypocrisy, Thomas played the race card, claiming that the accusations were a "high-tech lynching" because he was an "uppity black" -- even though Anita Hill is also black.

Decades later, Ginni Thomas harassed Anita Hill by calling her and leaving unhinged voicemails demanding she apologize.